running dry

the problem with aid, for the most part, is that no aid is free. just ask all the south american countries under the foot of the world bank and the international monetary fund. in hamas' case, they cannot hope to run a government with a platform that basically endorses violence against israel. that is state sanctioned violence, and let's face it, terrorism. (most of the victims of suicide bombing tend to be civilians, which makes it terrorism.) as much sympathy as i have for the palestinian people and what they've gone through, i don't really feel too bad about foreign aid being pulled until hamas renounces violence. hamas has to understand that the shortest rout to peace is non-violence. really it is. the palestinian people have to ask themselves, are their lives better off today then before? clearly violence isn't working. the same goes for the israeli people. the problem is that it's hard to think straight when you're seeing your friends blown up by suicide bombers or you watch your family home be demolished by israeli tanks. so i empathyse. but i don't have to agree, and i certainly don't have to have my tax money going to support a government that basically commits state sanctioned violence.
the palestinians that voted for hamas had to have known what they were getting into, or if they didn't, they are now paying for their naievity. the problem with democracy is that as a voter, you are somewhat accountable to the actions of the government you voted into office. if the government you voted in does wrong, or intends to do wrong, it is your responsibility as a voter to hold the government accountable (or at least punish them in the next election). if you don't do anything, or even go so far as to re-elect the criminal or corrupt government, then you must bare some of that responsibility. (*cough* *cough* bush! *cough* *cough* iraq war! *cough* *cough* illegal wire taps! *cough* *cough*)
|